Why? Now you don’t have to choose between analog and digital KVM solutions!
Only Raritan allows you to integrate your company’s analog and
digital KVM solutions (and serial devices) for truly seamless IT infrastructure
management.
Raritan’s CommandCenter allows analog and digital KVM to peacefully
coexist, while providing centralized management through a single sign-on
to a single interface, with secure, anytime, anywhere access via Web browser.
When evaluating analog or digital KVM solutions, consider the following
factors:
User Distance From Target Servers
If primary users are in the data center or within 300 meters of connected
devices, an analog KVM solution may be appropriate. Remote access can
be provided to occasional or after-hours users through an IP-Reach gateway
or IP-enabled user station, the UST-IP. Remote access is also available
via integration with CommandCenter and Paragon II System Controller.
If the primary users are outside the data center — for example,
in a network operations center (NOC) that supports multiple data centers
— then a KVM-over-IP solution is more appropriate. The same is true
for a lights-out data center, where physical access is not assumed for
regular IT management tasks.
Non-Blocked Access Requirements
Analog KVM switches can provide non-blocked access for up to 64 users.
KVM-over-IP switches currently support up to 4 remote users and 1 local
one. If more than 5 users need simultaneous access, only the first 5 will
be able to access devices; additional users will be blocked. It is possible
to overcome the blocking limitation of KVM-over-IP by spreading servers
requiring frequent management across different KVM switches.
Cabling Limitations
KVM-over-IP solutions require less Cat5 cabling per rack. If an existing
data center is being retrofitted for KVM and multiple Cat5 cable runs
are not feasible, KVM-over-IP is probably the best way to go. If multiple
cable runs can be easily added, this is not a deciding factor.
Performance (Mouse Synchronization) Requirements
Analog KVM, running locally “out of band,” (over its own network),
provides the best mouse synchronization. Depending on network traffic
and user-to-switch distance, mouse response on KVM-over-IP may experience
a small lag; this limitation is inherent to IP and not specific to any
product. While perfectly acceptable for most applications, in some cases,
even minimal latency may be a deciding factor to choose an analog Cat5
KVM solution.
Video Quality
KVM/Cat5, running locally “out-of-band,” (over its own network)
provides the best video quality. Depending on network traffic and user-to-switch
distance, video quality on KVM-over-IP may experience some degradation;
this limitation is inherent to IP and not specific to any product. While
perfectly acceptable in most applications, even minimal video degradation
may be a deciding factor in favor of Cat5 for other applications. Raritan
KVM gives users the flexibility to conserve bandwidth by adjusting the
color depth of video transmission over IP.
Network Independence
KVM/Cat5 solutions are completely “out of band,” meaning they
are not part of the data center LAN or WAN. They provide an alternate
path to servers’ keyboard, video and mouse ports, thus allowing
control of servers even if the network fails.
KVM-over-IP solutions, on the other hand, rely on a LAN connection between
the user and the switch, and are therefore dependent on the health of
the LAN. It is possible to achieve reliability close to that of a KVM/Cat5
solution by using a separate network to insulate KVM traffic from network
congestion and failures.
Security
Analog KVM switching, by definition, is performed over a dedicated, on-site
network. As long as it is fully out-of-band, it is as secure as its physical
location; servers cannot be reached by any off-site users. Therefore,
Analog KVM is the preferred choice for extremely security-conscious users
such as financial and governmental organizations. KVM-over-IP switching,
while not as secure because it rides the IP network, can be made equally
secure with proper application of encryption, authentication and authorization
technologies.
| Analog vs. Digital KVM: Comparison |
| |
Analog KVM |
Digital KVM |
Hybrid
Infrastructure |
| Network Independent |
YES |
* |
YES |
Real-time
Video/Mouse Response
|
YES |
|
YES |
| Requires Less Cabling & Components |
|
YES | YES |
| Easier Scaling at Lower Cost Per Port |
|
YES |
YES |
| Unblocked Access to More Simultaneous Users |
YES |
|
YES |
| Leverages Existing LAN Infrastructure |
|
YES |
YES |
| Uses Network Bandwidth |
|
YES |
YES |
| Security |
** |
§ | ** § |
| Alternative Access Methods |
|
*** |
*** |
* Can be run over a separate maintenance network
** Security enhanced through out-of-band, isolated access path
*** Supports modem access in case of network failure
§ Enhanced security via 128-bit or higher SSL encryption of keyboard, video
and mouse signals. |